Common slip-ups

You're saying it wrong! These are the 10 most common grammar mistakes

Credit: JESHOOTS.COM

We all slip up from time to time, but it turns out that some errors are more common than others, especially when it comes to reading and writing. Of course, there is no "unique" way to use language, but even if we've spoken English since childhood, there are still common "mistakes" that native speakers tend to make. Read on to see if you make any of these too!

Credit: Nick Fewings

Ever received a message that reads, "I love they're new house"? Homophones are words that sound the same (or very, very similar), and this is the case with "there," "their," and "they're," which is why many native speakers tend to confuse them.

However, these three words have quite different meanings and functions. "There" can be used with the verb to be, as in "There's a problem with your order," or as an adverb to indicate place: "I found the cat; it's there!" On the other hand, "their" functions as a possessive, indicating ownership, as in "I love their new house." Finally, "they're" is a contraction of "they are," as in "They're a lovely couple."

Credit: Markus Spiske

You've probably written or read something like "I think your right about that" or "I'd love to meet you're parents." These usages are considered incorrect, but don't worry—you’re not alone! Like the words in the previous entry, "your" and "you're" are homophones, meaning they sound identical when spoken.

To understand them better, remember that "you're" is a contraction of "you are" (pronoun + verb), as in "You're the best friend I ever had." Meanwhile, "your" is a possessive adjective, which indicates that something belongs to "you."

Credit: the blowup

This case is different from the previous ones. The common confusion between "fewer" and "less" has nothing to do with pronunciation but rather with meaning, as both are quantifiers used for comparisons and indicate a smaller quantity.

The key is knowing which type of noun each word should be used with. "Fewer" is used with countable nouns (things you can count individually), as in "He made fewer mistakes this time." On the other hand, "less" is used with uncountable nouns (things you can't count individually, as they are considered a whole), such as in "You drank less water today than yesterday."

Credit: Thought Catalog

Another case of commonly confused words is "affect" and "effect." In addition to their similar pronunciation, these two terms also have related meanings, making it even more challenging to distinguish between them.

"To affect" is a verb meaning "to cause a change" or "to influence." For example, you can say, "Cold weather affects my mood." On the other hand, "effect" is a noun that indicates the consequence of an action or change, as in "The storm had a devastating effect on the city." To simplify: "affect" is the action, while "effect" is the result.

Credit: mohammad takhsh

Many times, we tend to say things like, "The teacher gave an assignment to Lily and I." While that's quite common, it's actually a grammatical error.

We know it’s difficult to tell them apart: both are pronouns used to refer to oneself. However, each has a different function. "I" is used as the subject of the sentence (the one performing the action), as in "Sarah and I went to the store." "Me," on the other hand, is used as the object of the sentence (the one receiving the action), as in, "The doctor told Lucas and me to drink more water."

Credit: Jozsef Hocza

Another pair of very, very similar words: lose and loose. The key to distinguishing them is understanding what kind of word each one is.

"Lose" is a verb, meaning it always indicates an action (and can be expressed in the past, present, or future tense). For example: "I don't want to lose my keys" or "Joan lost the remote control." On the other hand, "loose" is an adjective, meaning it describes the characteristics, state, or condition of something, as in "I prefer loose pants; tight ones make me uncomfortable."

Credit: René Porter

"I slept well last night" or "I slept good last night"? (Spoiler: it's the first one!) But why? While both "well" and "good" are used to describe something positively, they are different types of words.

"Well" is an adverb, meaning it describes the verb. In the sentence "She sings well," the adverb modifies the verb "sings." Meanwhile, "good" is an adjective, so it describes a noun, as in "She's a really good singer!"

Credit: Ben Mullins

The confusion between "could have" and "could of" is so widespread that many of us sometimes don’t even notice it. This error usually occurs because of the way they sound when pronounced.

When said quickly in conversation, "could have" can sound like "could of." But there's only one correct form: "could have" ("could of" has no grammatical meaning). For example, "I could have done better on the test" is correct, while "I could of done better on the test" is not.

Credit: Vladislav Muslakov

Ok, homophones really can cause chaos, and this is the case with the words "lay" and "lie," which also have similar meanings. We must warn you: If you say, "I need to lay down," you're officially guilty!

While both words have to do with position, "lay" requires a direct object (something being placed), whereas "lie" does not. In other words, "lay" means to put something down (it needs an object), while "lie" means to recline or rest (no object needed).

Credit: Randy Tarampi

Finally, we have a word that has often been used incorrectly or exaggeratedly in recent times: "literally" — or just "lit" if you're really cool.

According to the dictionary, "literally" means something happened exactly as stated, without exaggeration. However, in modern slang, it's often used to emphasize or dramatize a situation. For example, you might hear someone say, "I literally died laughing." Of course, if they're saying it, then luckily, they didn't literally die!

AND YET IT MOVES

In Love With The Moon? 10 Fascinating Facts About Our Celestial Companion

Credit: Mahdi Soheili

Humanity has been enamored with the Moon since ancient times. Our closest celestial body not only has captivated human imagination and scientific inquiry like no other, but it might also be partly responsible for our existence.

From cataclysms of cosmic proportions to the possibility of liquid water, and the mysteries behind its lack of atmosphere, there is a wealth of facts to explore about our dearest companion in the Universe. Get ready to embark on a journey to the far side of the Moon!

Credit: Brian McGowan

The Moon’s gravity is about one-sixth that of Earth’s, meaning that objects and people weigh significantly less on the lunar surface. This lower gravity affects everything from movement to the behavior of liquids and dust.

The reduced gravity poses unique challenges and opportunities for lunar exploration and habitation. Astronauts on the Moon can leap higher and carry heavier loads than on Earth, but long-term exposure to low gravity requires careful consideration for human health and engineering design.

Credit: Lou Batier

The Moon isn't actually white but rather a dark, charcoal gray. It only appears bright because of its high albedo, or the efficiency with which it reflects sunlight.

Despite its dark color, the Moon reflects about 12% of the sunlight that hits it, which is enough to make it appear bright against the backdrop of space. This high reflectivity is due to the regolith, the layer of dust and crushed rock on the lunar surface, which scatters sunlight effectively.

Credit: NASA

Unlike Earth, the Moon doesn't have tectonic plates, but it experiences moonquakes -seismic tremors caused by tidal forces from Earth. These quakes can last for up to an hour and can reach a magnitude of about 5 on the Richter scale.

Scientists first detected moonquakes during the Apollo missions, and recent studies using data from seismometers left on the Moon by astronauts have provided valuable insights into its internal structure and composition.

Credit: NASA

The Moon's pockmarked surface not only reflects its tumultuous history but also underscores its crucial role as Earth's protector. Without the Moon, our planet would have endured far more frequent impacts from asteroids and comets.

And, as any dinosaur might tell you, it’s never a good thing to be relentlessly pounded by space rocks. Also, these lunar craters serve as portals to the Moon's ancient past, preserving a record of cosmic impacts that shaped planetary evolution.

Credit: Nadiia Ploshchenko

The Moon's gravitational pull doesn't just affect ocean tides -it also stabilizes Earth's axial tilt, which influences our planet's climate and seasons over geological time scales. Without the Moon, Earth's tilt could vary dramatically, leading to extreme climate fluctuations.

This stabilizing effect has profound implications for the development and sustainability of life on Earth. Some scientists even believe that, without the Moon, there might not even be life as we know it.

Credit: Alexander Andrews

The Moon's orbit around Earth isn't perfectly circular, leading to subtle changes in its appearance called libration. This phenomenon allows us to see slightly more than half of the Moon's surface over time, revealing glimpses of its far side.

Librations have been observed since the time of Galileo, enabling astronomers to gradually map the entirety of the Moon's surface and study its geological features in detail.

Credit: Ricardo Gomez Angel

For decades, scientists believed the Moon was bone-dry. However, recent discoveries have revealed traces of water molecules trapped in lunar soil and ice deposits in permanently shadowed craters near the poles.

These findings have profound implications for future lunar exploration, as water is essential for sustaining human life and producing rocket fuel. Mining lunar water could enable long-term lunar habitation and expedite missions to Mars and beyond.

Credit: Arto Marttinen

The leading theory for the Moon’s formation is the Theia Hypothesis, which suggests it was created from debris left after a Mars-sized body, Theia, collided with Earth about 4.5 billion years ago.

This colossal impact would have ejected vast amounts of material into orbit around Earth, which eventually coalesced to form the Moon. This hypothesis explains many aspects of the Earth-Moon system, such as the Moon’s composition and its relatively large size compared to other natural satellites.

Credit: NASA

While Earth is surrounded by a dense atmosphere that protects life and moderates temperatures, the Moon has an exosphere -a very thin layer of gases like helium, neon, and hydrogen atoms. This sparse atmosphere offers little protection from the harsh environment of space.

However, according to NASA, approximately 4 billion years ago the Moon possessed a relatively thick atmosphere. It was about twice as dense as Mars' current atmosphere, leading some to speculate that it might have been capable of supporting life, although no evidence of life has been discovered. Over time, this atmosphere was stripped away by solar winds and gradually dissipated into space.

Credit: Ryan Holloway

Shockingly, the Moon is gradually drifting away from Earth at a rate of about 1.5 inches per year. This process, driven by tidal interactions, has been occurring for billions of years. As the Moon moves away, its gravitational influence on Earth’s tides weakens slightly, and Earth's rotation slows down.

But don't get sad! This process is so slow that long before the Moon has a chance to slip away completely, the Sun's expansion into a red giant will likely engulf most of the solar system, including Earth. Yeah, it might not be the happiest of endings, but still.